Despite the advances in digital, film is most certainly not dead and has that timeless look that digital simply cannot hope to match. Simply put, Mastin Labs has the closest film emulation presets available on the market today. The options are much more abundant compared to VSCO, making it easier to get desirable answers for Mastin Labs than VSCO. Getting critiques, answers to questions, and support can help generate a better understanding of the different presets. Though it can go ignored when comparing presets, it also helps that there is excellent customer service through Mastin.
#MASTIN LABS FUJI PUSHED DOWNLOAD PROFESSIONAL#
When including a second shooter for professional events, there is no need to tweak images to match in post-processing. They have presets for Nikon, Canon, and the Fuji X-series users as well. Mastin’s presents will also work with both ACR and Lightroom. VSCO images can look flat from time to time in comparison. You get richer blacks and more brilliant whites while maintaining dimension and depth. Mastin presents also tend to preserve the details within the images. Mastin Labs is plain and simple, coming out looking good on film. Mastin has a clean-cut look, usually resulting in a happier, tweak-free initial result. It caters to a much broader range of preferences and styles than the Mastin Labs offerings. VSCO will also give you quite the versatility on images. That means more variety from the very beginning, though they tend to require extensive tweaking to get them exactly as you want them to be.
VSCO, meanwhile, gives you a ton of different film emulations in each pack. That is in addition to all of the crop presets that will help match actual film dimensions. Each of them has a one-click adjustment option as well as 35mm or medium-format film grain options. The first is that Mastin will give you a trio of film emulations in each pack. Yet in others, the contrast can jump out drastically. In some images, there is a minimal difference. When you compare them directly, the results can be somewhat more difficult to compare and contrast. The presets, as such, have improved by quite a bit over time.īut when it comes to general quality and accuracy compared to real film, Mastin Labs tends to be miles ahead. VSCO, starting with the 01 film pack and progressing to the 07, have taken the time to perfect their process. Most people tend to buy a preset because of the looks that they give, not for any of the extras that they include. There is no offering for changing from 160 to 400 to 800, though. What does this mean? You get a choice between 35mm and the medium format levels for grain that can be applied separately. The grain profiles for Mastin Labs tend to all be the same for each of their presets and aren’t applied by default.
VSCO has all of their “+” alternative looks presets. Another important thing to note is that Mastin Labs does not have that varied look that VSCO has become known for. VSCO does, however, have a Portra 400 + 3 whereas Mastin labs does not. How Does Mastin Labs Compare with VSCO?įor one, Mastin Labs has Portra 800 + 2 and 160 + 2 presets VSCO does not. This is where the new presets such as Mastin Labs can be so helpful in achieving that closer look in much shorter time. If you have Portra films, that is one thing, but matching the digital can become time-consuming when it comes to tweaking curves and sliders. Pushing is the effect that allows you to shoot at higher ISOs while also adding color casts and contrast to the film images. These presets help to make those digital raw photographs look like they are real Kodak Portra films when they are pushed in development. How Does Mastin Labs Compare with VSCO?.
0 kommentar(er)
